The European Commission has accused the search engine giant for using undue advantage of its market dominance
Last week, the European Commission disclosed that after carrying out a probe against Google for almost a year it has finally concluded that the Internet search giant has been violating the antitrust laws of European Union. Consequently, the commission launched a formal antitrust against Google and its parent –Alphabet Inc., the commission also released a public statement explaining why the company has been charged for the offense.
According to EU, Google has been taking undue advantage of its dominant position in three inter-connected markets which is a hard blow on the competitors. The EU alleged Alphabet Inc.’s subsidiary for limiting certain Android aspects by make pre-installing Chrome apps and Google search in the Android powered mobile devices. In case any phone maker use any alternative version of Android then Google blocks the phone maker. Moreover, the EU has concluded that the tech giant has illegally paid mobile phone companies and device makers for the exclusive pre-installation of Google search.
On restricting the competition in Android, Google has said that the Android is an open-source which indicates that anybody can create the flavor which they like therefore the competition in this platform is very much open and is not restricted by the company.
Back in 2010 too, the EU had investigated Google’s online search practices and had accused the company for favoring its own website over the rivals –such as Yelp. That investigation was carried out for more than five years while Google offer different settlements which got rejected each time.
In April 2015, afterwards, the commission proposed that it was launching a formal case against the company which pertains only to Google shopping. In this new case, the EU is tirelessly involved in controlling the tech giant’s efforts to hold a strong position in transitioning from the search on desktop to search on mobile. The new case is two-fold: the address search launched in 2010 and the company’s efforts of bolstering the competition.
Google’s claim of Android being an open-source is partially true. Although the operating system is open source however there are few fragments of the software which are the exclusive property of the company under the version of “Apache Software License.” The code which is available on the open source may not necessarily come with all the functions which are generally available in the Google’s Android.
Moreover, according to the commission, the mere competition doesn’t mean that the company cannot be stopped for abusing its power. Under the compliance of European anti-trust law, the undue advantage of dominant position is a big no. The European Commission has expressed that the Google has dominance in three different markets which includes, “licensable smart mobile operating systems, app stores for the Android mobile operating system, and general internet search services.” According to EU, Google is taking the unfair advantage of its dominance when it requires the phone maker to install Chrome app and Google settings if they install Google Play on the phone. The commission believes that Google is playing this strategy to increase the searches done on Google on the mobile phones.
This is not an unusual action taken by the government in an attempt to curtail the stifling competition. The officials tend to establish a market with fair competition. Any firm which synchronizes its product in such a way that it influences a dominant product then it is highly likely to get the attention of antitrust inquiry onto itself. What steps will be taken by the Internet search giant will be unfold in the near future.









